Save Our State of Massachusetts
And I’ve debunked the lobbyist arguments in favor of earmarks.
Heck, I’ve even done NPR interviews about this unseemly Washington practice.
So I like to think I’m reasonably knowledgeable about the system. But even I’m shocked to learn how a former Massachusetts Congressman has taken graft to the next level.
And I’m slightly happy that he’s been caught with his hand in the cookie jar and feels compelled to give up his share of the loot.
Here are some excerpts from a report in the New York Times.
A former congressman who became a lobbyist has abandoned his plans to collect $90,000 from working on an energy project that he helped finance through Congress. …An apologetic Mr. Delahunt told town officials he wanted to eliminate the “black mark” created by questions of a possible financial conflict, Patrick Cannon, chairman of the Hull Light Board, said on Saturday. …Mr. Delahunt, a Democrat who retired from Congress last year, had faced criticism for the last week from legal and ethics specialists over the unusual lobbying arrangement he had struck with the town, which is seeking federal help to build an offshore wind energy plant at a cost of more than $60 million. While in Congress, Mr. Delahunt earmarked $1.7 million for the same project, and he was to be paid 80 percent of his monthly consulting fees out of that same pot of money. …Mr. Delahunt and executives at his firm did not respond to e-mails Saturday seeking further comment on the decision.
Wow. For all intents and purposes, Congressman Delahunt directly pilfered the Treasury for personal gain.
This is amazing. But what’s remarkable isn’t that he stole money. After all, the federal budget is largely a big scam enabling various groups of people to obtain unearned loot.
The noteworthy thing about this story is that he didn’t launder the money.
In most cases, politicians do earmarks as part of a corrupt quid pro quo. They direct money to a certain group of beneficiaries and, in exchange, get campaign contributions from both the lobbyists who facilitated the deal and the interest groups that receive the taxpayer funds.
But Delahunt cut out one of the middlemen. He created an earmark, and then became one of the lobbyists pocketing the cash.
So it is poetic justice that this unsavory deal has become public knowledge and the former Congressman has been shamed into giving up his fees.
But don’t be deluded into thinking this is a victory.
The earmark is still there. Money is still being wasted. Delahunt is still a lobbyist. Government is still too big. And corruption is still rampant.
And if you think the former Congressman is genuinely apologetic….well, please get in touch with me. I’m selling a bridge in Brooklyn and need a gullible buyer – i.e., the kind of person who doesn’t think there’s anything wrong with this unseemly example of sleaze.
Daniel J. Mitchell is a top expert on tax reform and supply-side tax policy at the Cato Institute.
Be the first to read Daniel J. Mitchell’s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.